Avram Noam Chmski once said: "Whoever controls the media controls the minds of the public." (see HERE)
Similar statements have been made by Jim Morrison (see HERE) and Allen Ginsberg (see HERE) as well as Malcolm X:
While these declarations are particularly applicable to state-run media, they also hold true in democracies where the media in general, and news organizations in particular, are highly politicized and politically biased, like in the U.S. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
The Left are quite adept at media manipulation (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), in large part because the vast majority of mainstream media personnel have been educated by liberal institutions and tend to vote Democrat and are funded by liberal donors (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)--though they are in deep denial about their bias. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
In recent times the biased has become more than self-evident, with the mainstream media doing little to hide its slant, even to the degree of following the same talking points (presumably circulated by the DNC or Obama White House), and lying to disparage Republicans. (see HERE and HERE--just a few of many that could be cited)
But, the Right-wing media, too, isn't immune to bias and slants. (see HERE and HERE and HERE)
Consequently, many viewers are either easily manipulated one way or the other, or they are conflicted--not knowing who or what to believe and trust. Confidence in media is at an all-time low (see HERE), with most of the distrust coming, understandably, from Conservatives. (see HERE)
For some time now the liberal media has been intent on sexually exploiting young children. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
Ben Shapiro rightly weighs in:
Here is an ad for Halloween costumes for little girls called Slutoween.
:
Leftist public institutions have also jumped on board by way of sex education curriculum that goes shockingly well beyond the "birds and bees"--see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE, and is even being taught to grade school children, including some kindergarten kids. (see HERE and HERE and HERE) [Update: Eroticizing the Classroom: Protect Your Kids]
Things that are said and done to children in sex ed classrooms would be considered as child abuse outside those classrooms, with several noted exceptions.
And, it goes beyond "education" to also supplying contraceptives to children as young as 10. (see HERE and HERE and HERE)
Were that not enough, boys and girls bathrooms are being gender-desegregated or "neutralized," even under ruling by the U.S. Justice Department. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE, etc.)
LGBT advocates have also actively exploited and indoctrinated young people. Kids as young as fourth grade have been the intended target of sustained and skillfully executed PR campaigns, which have manifest themselves both in popular media (ibid) as well as throughout our public school system (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), and this under the guise of "History" (see (see HERE and HERE and HERE) and "Multiculturalism" and "Safe Schools (See HERE and HERE and HERE). Here is a Top 10 list of strategies homosexual activists have used in public education. (See HERE)
And, it isn't just Right-wingers making this claim. Homosexual activists have also owned up to it (see HERE and HERE), and have included it as a plank in their manifestos and agendas. (see HERE and HERE and HERE),
Now, understandably, homosexual sympathizers have been quick to distance homosexuality from pedophilia (see HERE and HERE and HERE) even though studies have raised serious concerns somewhat to the contrary (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE). And, clever semantics have been employed to give the impression of greater distance than in reality (see HERE), and bold declarations by gay activists about child recruitment have been ardently downplayed (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
Never mind the fact that gay rights organizations like Boston-Boise Committee and the Mattachine Society and Gay Activist Alliance gave rise to the pedophilia/pederasty movement (see HERE and HERE and HERE), and several leading gay voices in the 1970's went on to become founding members and staunch supporters of NAMBLA and other pederast causes (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), not to mention that until the late 80's and early 90's, NAMBLA published a gay pedophilia magazine (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), and was a part of several gay alliances (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), and was even a welcomed participant in gay pride parades (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE) until it became politically inexpedient (see HERE), even though not a few people on the Left are in denial about this (see HERE).
It should come as no surprise, then, that pedophilia, which is estimated to be as prevalent if not more so than homosexuality (see HERE), has surged in reported incidences following the successes of the gay movement (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), and that the movement has become a springboard for so-called "inter-generational sexuality" (HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), which is the new code word for adults having sex with kids (see ibid, and HERE), as well as emboldening the movement towards pedophilia rights and normalization. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
This is not to equate homosexuality with pedophilia, or even suggest that homosexuals are generally in favor of sex with children. Rather, it is to show yet another way in which homosexuals have not only countenanced, but have used kids for their adult purposes.
Even still, there has recently been a ground swelling within the liberal press sympathetic to pedophilia, which lays the groundwork for pedophilia civil rights, seemingly patterned after the gay movement. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
In order to forward various causes, liberals have needed to redefine "woman" and "mother" and other female synonyms or cognates, oft in ways that are contradictory. Hence, we find the Left depicting women as both oppressed by men and yet powerful and equal to men.
And, while liberals have endowed women with a special classification and distinguished them in gender politics, particularly when it comes to health and economic issues (see HERE and HERE), the Left has also tried to obliterate meaningful differences between the sexes in pursuit of other causes such as "marriage equality." (see HERE and HERE).
It should come as no surprise, then, that gender confusion and androgyny is on the rise (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), as well as an increase in lesbians and bi-sexuality--particularly among young women (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HEREand HERE), and women have increasingly adopted some of the less admirable qualities of men, thereby lowering themselves. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
In short, liberals have for years highlighted the disparity between women and men with the intent of mobilizing to raise women up and bring them equality to men, only to eventually either lower them or render women meaningless in relation to men. Boomerang?
The liberal media has been poking fun at Rush Limbaugh for his comments about the NASA discovery of water on Mars. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE) Not surprisingly, the Left misleadingly attributed things to Rush that he didn't actually say. (see HERE and HERE) Theuy also ignore the accuracy of the prediction he actually made. (ibid, see also HERE)
So, I decided to have a little fun with liberal climate alarmist via my meme above.
In truth, Conservatives, like myself, don't doubt that over millions and millions of years the earth has gone through countless changes in climate and warming and cooling cycles.
They even don't deny that the earth has warmed and fluctuated in climate since the end of the last Ice Age thousands of years ago, or even the "Little Ice Age" hundreds of years ago.
What we QUESTION is whether the globe has been warming for the last decade or so:
We also QUESTION the catastrophic "hockey stick" predictions that have been rendered dubious by the warming pause, but also the extent to which humans have negatively impacted the global climate through use of fossil fuels, as compared with natural greenhouse effects like water vapor.
Even more so, we QUESTION whether the billions of dollars in economy damaging costs for climate change initiatives will cause any measurable positive change in the earth's climate.
Liberals claim that Voter I.D. laws, particularly those requiring photos, are racists and sexists and discriminate against the poor and aged--i.e. major Democrat voting blocks. (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
If so, then by the same "logic," all the liberal and governmental entities that require I.D.s, particularly photos, are racists, sexists, and discriminate against the elderly and poor, such as: see HERE and HERE and and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
Also, these countries must also be racist, sexist, and discriminate against the poor because they require voter I.D.s: Africa, Mexico, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, Ireland, Greece, France, etc.) (see: HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE)
.
In our upside-down world it is not surprising to find liberals employing words in ways that effect the opposite from the traditional meaning. This applies no less to the word "diversity" (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE) as it does to its synonym, "multiculturalism." (see HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE), both of which are rousing failures. (ibid)
Indictment of multiculturalism and diversity by Thomas Sowell:
Considerable political capital has been manipulatively derived from liberal compassion, much of which has been squandered, but without raising much if any concern on the Left.(see HERE) Evidently, for liberals it is the thought, and not the results, that count.
